Let’s have some F-un and start by deconstructing the word In-eff-able. The prefix “in” implies an opposite. For example, inexpensive is not expensive or intangible is not tangible. So what does “not effable” mean? Before we explore the answer to this question, lets look at the suffix “able”. Able as we all know means capable of. Putting these pieces together ineffable can be translated as “not capable of eff”. Logically this deconstructive approach leaves us asking what the F “eff” means.
Ineffable is such a paradoxical word. It’s common definition is “too great or extreme to be expressed or described in words”. So it’s a word about words that can’t even be uttered due to their transcendental nature.
I first heard of the concept of ineffability during a workshop at the Chakra Institute. After several days of teachings and practices we finally arrived at the sixth chakra (third eye center). The teacher explained that this energy center was physically above the sensory organs and energetically above the five fundamental elements of nature (earth, water, fire, air, and space). Accordingly the sixth center is inwardly focused and serves as the commander and witness of the lower chakras. Awareness at this energy center views everything as perfect just the way it is. There’s no judgement or desire for change from this perspective. There’s just silence with a deep knowing of one’s ineffable or inexpressible true nature.
The challenge arises when we start to be effable and try to express that true essence in words. Once we attach a word to our true essence then we feel compelled to defend it at all costs. In fact, it seems to me that the articulation of the ineffable is the root cause of most of the problems in the world.
From the religious perspective many people in world history have killed each other due to their conviction and insistence on their God being the only true essence possible. From the spiritual perspective oneness, pure consciousness, truth, energy, and love are often attempts at capturing the ineffable meaning of true nature. Still even these non-denominational words create dissension depending on one’s preferences and affinity for different traditions or beliefs.
In my light hearted ponderings on this conundrum I think that I’ve figured out a fun solution. The F in ineffable is for Faction. In other words, not capable of being part of a faction. Even an ultra compelling one or one that your family, culture, or country support. In short, as soon as we link our true essence to a word we automatically imply separation from others and tension inevitably ensues.